In Tom LeClair’s, Closing The Loop: White Noise, at first his review was very
confusing to me, more confusing that White
Noise itself. LeClair begins his
review with all sorts of comparisons to many of DeLillo’s other works. I do not fully understand the necessity of
these multiple comparisons. He then goes
on to summarize the story. He tells us
of the family dynamics and setting of the story in part 1. Then he tells us of the horrifying toxic
event and its multiple affects in part 2.
And, finally he tells us about Jack and Babette’s fear of death and all
of the weird things that transpire because of this major fear.
While I found White Noise to be a little twisted and
difficult to follow at times; I must say that I found LeClair’s review of it
even more confusing and difficult to read.
At least the first few paragraphs, after that I mostly found his review
to be enlightening. He pointed out specifics
that I hadn’t given much thought to before.
LeClair speaks of the story’s reductiveness, irony and loops to mention
a few. Anyway, a lot for me to take in
and attempt to figure out.
Citation:
Delillo, Don. White Noise, Text And Criticism. New
York, NY: Penguin Group USA, 1998. Print.
LeClair, Tom. Closing the Loop: White Noise. New York, New York: Penguin
Group, 1986. 387-411. Print.